User talk:LoonWoof

Archived Conversations

List For Front Page Changes
Hey, if you want to quickly give me a list of "a should be under b" ect for the front page, that'd be great. I've notice some things aren't under the correct pages so let's put everything where they make the most sense. –Pamcakes (talk) 4:51PM, 13 October 2014 (EST)

re: gallery oddities
This is good shtuf! Have you added it to (m)any pages yet? Is it alright to do so now? Test it once in your sandbox to make sure I didn't screw it up. After that, feel free to implement it where ever it makes sense. Some other things that "don't work as expected"... My preference is to put these other oddities very low on my priority ranking. (Assuming you can work around them.) Partly because they feel like more of a 'polish' thing, and partly because I have a bad feeling that I'd have to learn how they wrote that gallery format and then muck around in it myself.

–Red Agliator (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

getting rid of parentheses in query results
I didn't care for the way the test version put "(Transmutes from: xxx)" in parentheses and of course I had to try a version with images. The "(Transmutes from: xxx)" formatting comes because the query assumes you want to print a property name for every property you print. In other words, if you have, it's going to add those parentheses and those words.

You can tell  not to display that property name by adding the equals sign:

–Red Agliator (talk) 18:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Sandbox page snuck into the main namespace
Just a note: Bronze Age includes a row for User:LoonWoof/talk archive. I didn't want to tromp around your user space, so I'll leave editing that page to you. –Red Agliator (talk) 14:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Recent conversations
I've been puzzling over our recent conversations, trying to figure out what you've been aiming for. (I really do want us both to be satisfied.) At various times, you've talked about the individual tech pages, redirect pages, page vs text property types, and how many navigation clicks there are. In adding those ideas together, I'm wondering whether this might be the problem you've been wanting to change:

"Clicking on a link from a tool/weapon page should take the reader to an appropriate section of the Technologies page, instead of to the page for the individual technology.)"

Is this what you've been wanting to do? If so, I have some ideas that might help.

–Red Agliator (talk) 14:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)